When we bring Joseph Beuys’ concept of “Social Sculpture” into discussions about Process Art, Generative Art, and potential cybernetic systems, it quickly becomes clear that we have a fascinating addition on our hands. While Process Art highlights the transformation of material and Generative Art focuses on algorithmic procedures, Social Sculpture places the emphasis on society itself, understood as a malleable “material.” Not just paint, algorithms, or blocks of ice constitute the artist’s medium, but the entire social sphere—with all its relationships, dialogues, and actions.

Beuys espoused an expanded notion of art: Everyone is an artist, he argued, because each person contributes ideas and actions to shape society. In that sense, one could say Social Sculpture has its own distinctive way of unfolding as a kind of “Process Art.” The crucial difference is that its process doesn’t take place solely in a studio or via a computer program, but rather in the dynamic interplay of people, institutions, and day-to-day routines. When a cybernetic aspect is introduced—for instance, when feedback from the community constantly flows into the project and alters its direction—Social Sculpture can be viewed as a self-regulating system. Just as in Process Art, where materials respond to forces and undergo transformation, so does society respond to artistic impulses in Social Sculpture. Consider Beuys’ project “7000 Oaks”: planting the trees was merely the starting gun—only over time, and with the participation of many individuals, did a growing artwork emerge that tangibly affected social space.

Thus, the aesthetics of Social Sculpture aren’t found in any single, finished object, but rather in a continuous network of ideas and actions. Like Process Art, it can display organic change, and like Generative Art, it can incorporate rule-based procedures if certain guidelines or agreements are put in place. The decisive factor is that the work draws its form from collective interaction, thereby developing a lively, and in the best sense unpredictable, dynamism. This is precisely what makes Social Sculpture such an exciting expansion at the intersection of art, society, and cybernetic thought: it forges feedback loops not only with physical or digital processes but, above all, with human interaction—thus transforming society itself into an open field of artistic endeavor.

BACK